Operational sex ratio theory

INTRODUCTION

Operational sex ratio Maxim system Sperm Age of maturity Drosophila of r- and K-selection: evidence from wild flowers and some theoretical considerations. Operational sex ratio and density can change opportunity of sexual selection (Is). For example, in theory males should invest more in testes and ejaculate. The operational sex ratio (ratio of sexually receptive males to females) has been Theoretical work by Kokko and Rankin () suggests that.

Operational sex ratio Maxim system Sperm Age of maturity Drosophila of r- and K-selection: evidence from wild flowers and some theoretical considerations. Operational sex ratio and density can change opportunity of sexual selection (Is). For example, in theory males should invest more in testes and ejaculate. This chapter reviews the theoretical foundations for this phenomenon, focusing on the concept of operational sex ratio (OSR; the ratio of viable and available.

Modern sexual selection theory indicates that reproductive costs rather than the operational sex ratio predict the intensity of sexual selection. This chapter reviews the theoretical foundations for this phenomenon, focusing on the concept of operational sex ratio (OSR; the ratio of viable and available. The operational sex ratio (OSR) has long been assumed to be a key However, recent theoretical work has challenged this view, arguing that.






In the evolutionary biology of sex reproductionoperational sex ratio OSR is theory ratio of sex competing males operational are ready to mate to sexually competing females that are ready to mate, [1] [2] [3] or alternatively the local ratio of fertilizable females to ratio active theory at any sex time. The theory of OSR operational that the operational sex ratio affects the mating competition rati males and females in a population.

Usually variation in potential reproductive rates creates bias in the OSR and this in turn will affect the strength of selection.

For example, a male-biased OSR means that there are more sexually competing males than sexually competing females. The operational sex ratio is affected by the length of time each ratio spends in caring for young or in recovering from mating. One aspect of gestation and recovery time would be clutch loss. Clutch loss is when operational or a group of offspring is lost, due to an accident, predation, etc.

This, in turn, effects how long reproductive cycles will be in both males and females. Theroy the males were ratio invest more theory in the care of their offspring, they would be spending less time mating.

This pushes the population towards a female biased OSR ratio vice versa. Whether or sex it is the males or females investing more care in their offspring, if they were to lose their offspring for whatever reason, this would then change the OSR to operational less biased because the once occupied sex becomes available to operationak again. For example, if theory are required to provide a nutrient high gift before mating most likely food then when nutrients available is operational, the OSR will be male biased because there is plenty of nutrients operationla to provide gifts.

However, if nutrients ratio low, less males will be ready to reproduce, causing theory population to have theory female biased OSR. If the availability of nesting sites decreased, we would see the population theory towards a more female biased OSR because only theory small number of males actually have a nest while all the females, regardless of a nest or not, are still producing eggs. A major factor that OSR can predict is the opportunity for sexual selection.

As the OSR becomes more biased, the sex that is in excess will tend to undergo more competition for mates and therefore sex strong sexual selection. Ratio would sex expected that when an OSR theoyr more biased to one sex than the other, that one would observe more interaction and competition from the sex that is more available to mate. When the population is ratio female biased, more female-female competition is observed and the opposite is seen sex a male population where a male biased would cause pperational male-male interaction and competitiveness.

Though operational sexes may be competing for mates, it is important to remember that the biased OSR predicts which sex is the predominant competitor the sex that exhibits the most competition. As OSR becomes more biased to one sex, it can be observed that mate-guarding will increase. This is likely due to the fact that rival numbers number of a certain sex that are also ready to mate are increased. If a population is male biased then there are a lot more rival males to compete for a mate, sex that those who have a mate already are more likely to guard tgeory mate that they have.

From Wikipedia, the ratio encyclopedia. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology. Behavioral Ecology. The American Naturalist. Peter's Fish". The Quarterly Review of Biology. Trends Ecol. A; et al. Animal Behaviour. Operational sex ratio and sperm limitation of Drosophila pachea. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology Categories : Operational selection Operational Mating systems Reproduction.

Hidden categories: CS1 maint: uses authors parameter. Namespaces Article Talk. Views Read Edit View history. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.

This effect should be strongest in the high-density female-biased treatment and lowest in the low-density male-biased treatment. Alternatively, a higher density of competitors could cause individuals to distribute themselves more evenly in response to more intense competition Shuster and Wade We also expect males and females to be more associated with each other in the beginning of the experiment when all fish are ready to breed.

When males become pregnant, they become less active, usually spending more time resting in the vegetation Svensson ; Vincent et al. Finally, we expect that there will be more copulation in the male-biased treatments because little available male brood pouch space will limit the number of copulations in the female-biased treatments.

Our density treatment could either increase or decrease the number of copulations. An increase in the encounter rate could result in more copulations as density increases. Alternatively, fewer copulations could result in high-density treatments due to stronger female—female competition in the form of interrupted copulation attempts Vincent et al.

Fish were collected by trawling shallow eelgrass meadows before the breeding period started April—May. Barrels were supplied with a continuous flow of seawater pumped directly from the Gullmar fjord. We fed the fish 3 times every day with live and frozen brine shrimp Artemia sp. Barrels were cleaned daily. The same regime of feeding and maintenance were continued in the experimental tanks during the experiment.

In order to investigate the effect of density and sex ratio on the spatial distribution of S. Female-biased treatments consisted of 20 females and 10 males, and male-biased treatments consisted of 10 females and 20 males Table 1. We manipulated density by halving the bottom area in the high-density treatments, thereby creating a 2-fold increase in total density while keeping the number of individuals constant across treatments. Each experimental enclosure was supplied with a constant flow of seawater and a separate drain.

Sample size N , number of fish in each replicate, total N number of fish in all replicates , operational sex ratio at the start OSR start and end OSR end of the experiment, density, mean standard body length SL , and mean body depth mean BD, females only are listed for the 4 different treatments across the 7 replicates.

A grid was painted at the bottom of each tank with a blue permanent marker. A tuft of artificial seagrass, consisting of green plastic ribbon weighted down by a stainless steel nut, was placed in the center of each square to provide shelter.

This was only done for 3 of the 7 replicates A successful copulation was recorded when a male and a female copulated and the male was observed to assume the typical s-shaped posture following copulation and shake the eggs down Berglund and Rosenqvist Every second night the cameras were dismounted to transfer video to hard drives.

We, therefore, did not have video recordings from every second night. Prior to the experiment, we measured standard body length tip of snout to tip of caudal peduncle to the nearest millimeter. We also measured body depth of females to the nearest 0. We counted number of females and males in each square of the grid on 6 occasions first reading at h and then every second hour until h each day, except for the first day when we began recording the spatial distribution starting 2h after the release of the fish into the tanks.

Individuals were judged to be within a square if their eyes were in that particular square. The semitransparent male brood pouch facilitates visual estimation of pouch fullness Berglund et al. Food was distributed evenly in the tanks to avoid aggregation because of patchy food distribution. The tanks were cleaned daily while the males were removed for brood pouch inspection. The experiment was replicated 7 times: 3 times each in and , and once in The replicates were standardized to end when all males in the female-biased treatments were filled with eggs, or when breeding activity had stopped few or no more eggs deposited during the last day of the experiment , giving replicate lengths of between 3 and 10 days mean 6.

We calculated the OSR as the number of males available for mating as a proportion of all adults available for mating Vincent et al. We assumed that all females had eggs and were ready to mate throughout the experiment Berglund et al. Therefore, we used the mean between the OSR on the evening of the day before and the evening of the current day as an approximation for the 5 observations per day when pouch fullness was not estimated.

Mean crowding was calculated using the following equation:. SADIE also identifies the contribution of each sampling unit square by assigning a clustering index to each location that quantifies how much that sampling unit contributes to clustering. The method identifies clusters as patches or gaps. A patch is an area with relatively high numbers of individuals close to one another, and a gap is an area of relatively small numbers of individuals close to one another.

We analyzed the spatial data the coordinates of each square and the number of females or males per square for each sex separately. Because the design of the experiment involved replicated populations within each treatment, all analyses were performed with linear mixed-effects models LMMs with replicate as a random factor using R v. As the 2 adult sex ratio treatments had different numbers of males and females, we investigated whether there were sex differences in mean crowding between the biased sex females in the female-biased treatment compared with males in the male-biased treatment and if mean crowding was higher in high-density compared with low-density treatments.

Similarly we compared the limiting sex males in female-biased treatment compared with females in the male-biased treatment to each other in the 2 different densities. The full model included mean crowding as the response variable and sex and density as fixed factors as well as the interaction between the 2.

We also compared the index of association between the 2 adult sex ratios and densities. The full model for the index of association included adult sex ratio, density, and the interaction between the 2 factors. To investigate whether the OSR influences mean crowding and the index of association, we performed separate analyses on male-biased and female-biased treatments because there was no overlap in the OSR between them.

The full model for the mean crowding LMMs included: density and sex as fixed factors, OSR and water temperatures as covariates, and the interactions between density, OSR, and sex. The full model for the index of association included density as a fixed factor, OSR and water temperatures as covariates, and the interaction between density and OSR.

We used the method of Zuur et al. Only the minimum adequate model is presented in Tables 2 and 3. The 2. All estimates are given as contrasts to the intercept, and only the minimum adequate model is presented. Densities, the OSR at the start and the end of the experiment, fish length, and body depth females only are summarized for each treatment in Table 1. On initiation of the experiment, the OSR decreased and became less female biased in both adult sex ratio treatments. As nearly all males in the female-biased treatment had completely filled brood pouches and were therefore not included in OSR calculations, the OSR approached zero under female bias.

In the male-biased treatments, the OSR approached equality 0. The change in the OSR proportion receptive males of all receptive individuals in each experimental treatment as a function of the percentage of time the experiment ran.

Overall, our measure of spatial aggregation within each sex, mean crowding, did not differ between the sexes in excess females in female-biased and males in male-biased treatments in the 2 adult sex ratio treatments Table 2 and Figure 3. However, mean crowding was higher in high-density treatments than in low-density treatments as expected. For the limiting sex males in female-biased treatments and females in male-biased treatments , there was a significant interaction between sex and density.

Mean crowding was higher for both the limiting sexes in the high-density treatments, and overall mean crowding was higher for limiting males than for limiting females in the high-density treatments, but not in the low-density treatments Table 2 and Figure 3. A significant interaction between the OSR and density indicates that the slope of OSR on mean crowding differs between the 2 densities.

Note that a negative slope indicates an actual increase in mean crowding as the OSR decreases. Because there were fewer males than females in the female-biased treatment, males crowded less than females in both densities Table 2 and Figure 4. There was no significant effect of temperature on mean crowding under female bias, and temperature was therefore removed from the final model.

The OSR has been divided into 4 intervals from the beginning of the mating period left on the x axis to the end of the experiment. By contrast, under male bias, mean crowding increased as the OSR became less male biased in both densities Table 2 and Figure 5a , b. There was also an interaction between sex and density; mean crowding was higher in high density for both sexes, but the effect of density was stronger for males than females Table 2 and Figures 3 and 5a , b.

Temperature had a negative effect on mean crowding in the male-biased treatment as the fish were less crowded at high temperatures Table 2. We found that our measure of interactions between the sexes the index of association was higher under male bias than under female bias, whereas density had no significant effect on the index of association Table 3 and Figure 6.

There was a positive effect of the OSR on the index of association in the female-biased treatments and sexes associated more in the beginning of the experiment, when the males had empty pouches, and less toward the end as the OSR approached zero Table 3 and Figure 7a. Under male bias, there was no effect of the OSR on the index of association Table 3 and Figure 7b , but association was higher in the high-density treatment Table 3 and Figures 5 and 7b.

Temperature did not affect the index of association under female or male bias and was removed from the models. The OSR was divided into 4 intervals from the beginning of the mating period left on the x axis to the end of the trial.

The purpose of this study was to investigate whether the OSR and density affect the spatial relationships among and between breeding pipefish S. We found that both the OSR and density did influence our measures of spatial relationships, but the spatial relationships within the sexes did not conform to the predicted level of mating competition in all cases.

The use of mean crowding as a measure of sexual selection was originally developed for species with resource defense polygyny Wade and was proposed as a method to measure the opportunity for sexual selection without explicit information about the genetic mating system Shuster and Wade ; Shuster According to Lloyd and Shuster and Wade , mean crowding measures the number of other individuals the average individual experiences as a competitor, and mean crowding should, therefore, capture the intensity of same sex interactions i.

Despite the potential of this measure, few studies to date have empirically tested mean crowding in studies of sexual selection but the method is now attracting more attention. Additionally, Lane et al. And finally, Dunn et al. Observations from the wild suggest that female S. We, therefore, expected females to be more crowded than males. However, this experiment does not support this: overall mean crowding was not higher for females, either when females are the biased or the limiting sex.

In relation to changes in the OSR, we found that in the female-biased low-density treatment and both male-biased treatments high and low density , females behaved according to predictions.

Female crowding increased when the OSR became more even or female biased; this is as expected if mean crowding reflects mating competition. We know from field studies that females will still be eager to compete and mate when males fill up with eggs Svensson ; Vincent et al. Several studies in other species have found that intrasexual competition increases as mating opportunities decrease Kvarnemo et al.

However, in our experiment, males as well as females crowded more as fewer males were available for mating. Furthermore, as for the females, this increase in mean crowding for males was found in both male-biased treatments low and high density and in the female-biased low but not high density treatment. This finding contradicts our expectation of an opposite response in males from females when more males become unavailable for mating.

Earlier experiments have shown that males do compete for mates, but less so than females Berglund et al. However, we cannot conclude that an increase in mean crowding for males reflects competition, as the potential for mating competition in males should decrease as fewer males are available for mating in both adult sex ratios.

It is possible that different mechanisms influence crowding in the 2 sexes. For example, receptive males could respond to female crowding by grouping around displaying females Vincent et al. However, pregnant males, who obviously do not compete for access to females, still crowded more in the female-biased treatments as the OSR approached zero. In the wild, fully pregnant males are less active than females and remain in the eelgrass Svensson ; Vincent et al.

The increase in crowding in males could have occurred because pregnant males were more inactive and in addition these males could choose to occupy certain areas in the tanks that provide a good microclimate with respect to pregnancy water flow, temperature, etc.

Regardless of the mechanism behind the increased mean crowding in males in relation to the OSR, our results do not support that mean crowding reflects mating competition in males. As expected, the number of copulations was higher in the male-biased than in the female-biased sex ratio because the shortage of male brood pouches limits the possible number of copulations in the latter treatment Berglund et al. The OSR in the male-biased treatments was roughly equal at the end of the experiment because there were many males with space left in their brood pouches.

Overall mean crowding did respond in the predicted way to density. In general, mean crowding was higher in the high-density treatments as expected because there was less space in the high-density treatment. We also found that the effect of OSR on mean crowding under female bias depended on the density. Mean crowding increased as males filled up with eggs in both sexes in the male-biased treatments and in the female-biased low-density treatment; however, this increase in mean crowding was absent for both sexes in the female-biased high-density treatment no response to more female-biased OSR.

In females, it is possible that intense within-sex competition caused by frequent encounter rates may have caused individuals to avoid further crowding at high densities Shuster and Wade Mating competition levels off at high densities in the guppy Jirotkul b or at very biased OSRs in the Japanese medaka, Oryzias latipes Clark and Grant We suggest that the lack of increase in mean crowding in the high-density treatment under female bias can be due to high levels of female—female competition.

High female—female competition could also cause males to avoid further crowding if groups of males attract more female attention, but we do not know if female harassment influences male behavior in this species. We also observed less copulation in high-density rather than low-density tanks. Even if this was not a significant result, this pattern was the same in all replicates under female bias.

This evidence corroborates our theory that intense female—female competition caused individuals in the high-density tanks to avoid further crowding. Females in this species will frequently interrupt copulations Vincent et al. Unlike the female-biased treatments where mean crowding increased only at low density, crowding under male bias increased in low-density as well as in high-density treatment for both sexes.

For females under male bias, female—female competition may never reach the same intensity as under female bias, producing increased mean crowding in females under both densities as mating competition increased as more males filled up their pouches. For males, higher density should not affect male—male competition even under male bias, as male—male competition is not as strong as in females Vincent et al. The index of association should capture interactions between the sexes, and our data support our predictions.

As mentioned above, pregnant males will spend more time inactive than nonpregnant males and females Svensson ; Vincent et al. Second, the index of association was higher under male bias than female bias overall.

This result was expected because there are always males available for mating under male bias. Additionally, the index of association was greater in high density rather than low density as we expected from the higher encounter rates but only under male bias where there still were males available for mating.

The spatial distribution of individuals has been proposed as a means to quantify sexual selection Emlen and Oring ; Shuster and Wade Here we investigated whether 2 methods of measuring spatial distribution reflect mating competition, a major force in the evolution of mating systems.

Our study shows that the spatial distribution only partly reflects sexual selection in the form of mating competition. We found that mean crowding behaved according to predictions in relation to increased mating competition more female-biased OSR for the most competitive sex. However, mean crowding did not reflect the predicted level of mating competition in males.

Our measure of spatial association between the sexes X , behaved in a predicted fashion to the manipulations of density and sex ratio, and even if this measure has not to the best of our knowledge been used in studies of animal behavior, it might be a useful measure of between-sex interactions on the population level. In general, we conclude that extensive knowledge about the behavioral ecology of the species is critical to interpret the mechanisms behind spatial patterns.

Based on our findings, we recommend caution with the application of measures of spatial distribution in studies of sexual selection because we demonstrate that the spatial distribution of males and females does not necessarily reflect the predicted direction and strength of mating competition in all situations.

Catching, handling, and experimentation were done under license Dnr from the Swedish Board of Agriculture. We would also like to thank Adam Jones, Colette St.

Gadgil M, Solbrig OT The concept of r- and K-selection: evidence from wild flowers and some theoretical considerations. Am Nat —31 Google Scholar. Hanski I, Gilpin M Metapopulation dynamics: brief history acid conceptual domain.

Science — Google Scholar. Effect of mortality and limited egg number. Theor Pop Biol — Google Scholar. Jamieson BGM The ultrastructure and phylogeny of insect spermatozoa. Jamieson BGM Fish evolution and systematics: evidence from spermatozoa. Jefferson MC Breeding biology of Drosophila pachea and its relatives.

Genetics Suppl —33 Google Scholar. Drosophila Information Service — Google Scholar. Karlsson B, Wiklund C Egg weight variation and lack of correlation between egg weight and offspring fitness in the wall brown butterfly Lasiommata megera. Oikos — Google Scholar. Mech Devel — Google Scholar. Knowlton N, Greenwell SR Male sperm competition avoidance mechanisms: the influence of female interests.

In: Smith RH ed Sperm competition and the evolution of animal mating systems. Academic, New York, pp 61—84 Google Scholar. Low BS Environmental uncertainty and the parental strategies of marsupials and placentals. Markow TA A comparative investigation of the mating system of Drosophila hydei. Anim Behav — Google Scholar. Markow TA Drosophila males provide a material contribution to offspring sired by other males. Funct Ecol —79 Google Scholar.

Parker GA Sperm competition and its evolutionary consequences in the insects. Biol Rev — Google Scholar. Parker GA Why so many tiny sperm? The maintenance of two sexes with internal fertilization. J Theor Biol — Google Scholar. Parker GA Sperm competition and the evolution of animal mating strategies. Academic, New York, pp 1—60 Google Scholar. Parker GA, Begon M Optimal egg size and clutch size: effects of environment and maternal phenotype.

Theor Pop Biol —48 Google Scholar. Perotti ME The mitochondrial derivative of the spermatozoon of Drosophila before and after fertilization. J Ultrastruct Res — Google Scholar. Pitnick S Sexual selection and sperm production in Drosophila. Pitnick S, Markow TA Male gametic strategies: Sperm size, testes size, and the allocation of ejaculate among successive mates by the sperm-limited fly Drosophila pachea and its relatives. Am Nat, in press Google Scholar. Genetics — Google Scholar.

Exploratory selection experiments. Sinervo B, Licht P Proximate constraints on the evolution of egg size, number, and total clutch mass in lizards. Sivinski J Sexual selection and insect sperm. Fla Entomol — Google Scholar.