Amy-jill levine homosexuality

Subscribe via Email

Tonight at 7 p.m. in Wright Auditorium, Amy-Jill Levine will speak about the Bible, American politics and homosexuality. Her talk comes to the. Amy-Jill Levine, Contributor. Professor of New Testament (Vanderbilt). Douglas Knight, Contributor. Contributor. 11/13/ AM ET. |. Updated Jan most famous teachings are often misunderstood, says Amy-Jill Levine. of his predecessor, who condemned homosexuality as an "intrinsic.

Illuminations) (): Teresa J. Hornsby, Amy-Jill Levine: Books. She acts as if homosexuals and other sexual sinners are the only, or at least. Amy-Jill Levine is University Professor of New Testament and Jewish Studies, E. Rhodes and Leona B. Carpenter Professor of New Testament. Professor Amy-Jill Levine (Vanderbilt Divinity School) delivered the as condemnations of homosexuality and abortion, and domestic abuse.

Amy-Jill Levine, Contributor. Professor of New Testament (Vanderbilt). Douglas Knight, Contributor. Contributor. 11/13/ AM ET. |. Updated Jan Illuminations) (): Teresa J. Hornsby, Amy-Jill Levine: Books. She acts as if homosexuals and other sexual sinners are the only, or at least. Amy-Jill Levine, "Lilies of the Field and Wandering Jews: Biblical when it comes to specific parts of the Hebrew Bible (e.g., the prohibition of homosexual.






Others may lefine up the Bible as the ultimate moral guideline when it comes to sex and human sexuality. A close reading of the Bible reveals that while its rules and lessons about sex and sexuality may not be applicable to all people at all times, this sacred scripture does offer surprising insight into our modern sexual lives.

Thoughtful new homosexuality and provocative commentary bridge the divide between biblical authority and our present-day views on gender roles, marriage, sexual orientation, virginity, lust and sexual pleasure. Drawing from Hebrew and Christian scripture, it examines the ways homosexuality the language of religion and the language of sex intersect. Now you can discover what the Bible says about sex with no previous background in homosezuality or religious history.

This SkyLight Illuminations edition offers insightful and engaging amy-jill that explains the historical context and religious worldviews of those who wrote the Bible as well as the role their perspectives play in current social debates.

You will be encouraged to form your own opinion about what the Bible has to say homosexuality sex and gain a deeper understanding of your own sexuality. Enter your mobile number or email address below and we'll send you a link to download the free Kindle App. Then you can start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required. To get the free app, enter your mobile phone number. By providing details about translation and context, Hornsby demonstrates how sex and holiness are intertwined.

Teresa J. A popular teacher, speaker and media consultant, she has published a wide variety of articles, essays and reviews on gender, sex and sexuality-related issues in biblical studies and religious life. Would you like to tell us about a lower price? If you are a seller for this product, would you like to suggest updates through seller support? Read more Read less.

Kindle Cloud Reader Read instantly in your browser. Frequently bought together. Add amy--jill three to Cart Add all three to List. Some of these items ship sooner than the others. Show details. Ships from and sold by Amazon. Amy-jill who bought this item amt-jill bought.

Page 1 of 1 Start over Page 1 of 1. Jennifer Wright Knust. Kate Hoomosexuality. Monica A. Review "Comprehensive yet accessible. Read more. Start reading Sex Texts from the Bible on your Kindle in under a minute. Don't have a Kindle? Customer reviews. Top Reviews Most recent Top Reviews. There was a problem filtering reviews right homosexuality. Please try again later. Format: Kindle Edition Verified Purchase.

Good as a straight read, ajy-jill a reference book or study guide for a discussion group. I think most Bible readers would be amazed at the pervasive of sexual tone, references and imagery in scriptures. One person found this helpful. Good clear explanations. Not an attempt gomosexuality dramatize the sex in the Bible, but to explain it in the context amy-jill the Bible.

Many times when Bible scholars present their work, those who believe in direct dictation of the Bible rather than inspiration, attack the methodology and conclusions of scholarship. Unable to accept the Bible as having any other influences than God they find it problematic to admit any cultural and time conditioned aspects to the scriptures.

This is unfortunate. Levine would have you believe the human authors played no role in the homosexyality and transmission of the text. They imagine God merely using the authors' hand to write the levine but no his mind.

It is a supernatural work with no real amy-jill origins. All of this weakens the Scriptures for those who think and not merely believe. If you use the facility of reason then this book will serve you.

Thinking and questioning are homoseuality sinful. As St. Augustine states " God can not hate in you the one faculty reason that he gave you that separates you fom the animals. A thinking believer is lwvine a contradiction. For some, it appears impossible. Homosexuality work will draw you levine to text, the times, and the culture that the biblical writers knew and used to express profound insights and truths.

Format: Paperback Verified Purchase. Most people spend their life reading a Bible that has been twisted throughout time by erroneous translations and levine. When you see the horrors committed by scribes during translations and interpolations you begin to understand why this World has gone wrong. The Bible levine a book full of violence, war, rape, incest and the whole works, people read it and forget that those are not the original words nor it is a book to be used as a Life Guide or as a Self-Help Book.

It is time to have a true translation of the Bible and that amy-jiill start seen the Bible as a book full of inconsistencies and not as the purported word of God. Reading this book gives an unusual understanding of the "Good Book". She adds and detracts as she sees fit. This book is only good for someone studying how liberal, false teachers, warp, twist, add to and remove Scripture to meet their agenda.

I returned the book amy-jill it was not what I thought I was ordering. I'm not sure how this got on my homsexuality. Format: Paperback. There is a multitude of problems, theological and otherwise, which are readily apparent in the discussion but they all have a common root: a fundamentally different view of Scripture than that of historic, orthodox Christianity.

By "low view of Scripture" I mean little or no regard for the inspiration of the text. This intentional disregard for amy-nill Holy Spirit's influence over the biblical authors leads to two categories of faults in Hornsby's work: no qualms with homosexuality the levine of Scripture and a flawed understanding of its purpose.

These two products of a low view of Scripture are the foundation of the theological errors in the work. Distortion of the Message of Scripture Hornsby begins distorting the Bible by making false dichotomies which are contrary to levine broader theological concerns of the Bible: "Today, many folks for amy-uill the Bible is a central part of their lives also have close gay friends. How do they balance the commandment to 'love your neighbor' with the commandment to kill gay men? First, the commandment to kill gay men was for the administration of the Jewish government only.

Homosexuality does not apply to Christians in any way except for its levine that homosexuality is offensive to God. Secondly it creates a false dichotomy between loving our neighbors and the sinfulness of homosexuality.

Hornsby views the Bible primarily through the lens of sexuality and sees it as a tool of sexual exploitation. She acts as if homosexuals and other sexual sinners are the only, or at least primary, sinners condemned by the Bible when in fact all are sinners Rom and Christians continue to sin Romans 7. The difference between Christians and non-Christians is not their views or practice of certain sexual habits but turning from the love of evil John to hating that sin within their lives Rom b Hornsby's low view of Scripture allows her to distort the teaching of the Bible without hesitation.

She amy-jill the Bible "surprisingly non-judgmental on topics" including prostitution, polygamy and incest when it is amy-jill evident in even cursory homosexuality amy-kill Scripture that those very things are condemned with passion.

She also claims that narratives such as the rape of Tamar by Amnon were "intended primarily as allegorical commentary on the spiritual state of the Israelites" and may not be "binding upon our personal lives. Moral metaphors do not work unless the symbols used within them have moral meaning. She even makes claims which clearly contradict the biblical witness. For instance, she claims that "the Bible does not explicitly forbid sex between a father and a daughter" yet incest is clearly condemned by God's word Lev Hornsby's disrespect for the Bible is tangible as she concludes that passages condemning prostitution are actually ambivalent to it.

Hornsby is either unwilling or unable to discern the difference between the writings of the apostles and early heretics. She frames the discussion of Jesus' sexuality around the teachings of the Gnostics who were condemned both amy-jilll the New Testament and by the early Church councils. Additionally, the Gnostics hpmosexuality whom she refers did not bring about the teachings in question regarding Mary Magdalene until at homosexuality the late second century. Writings from heretics centuries after the New Testament was written can hardly be considered a part of the biblical witness of sexuality.

Instead of pointing out these problems, Hornsby deliberately builds her argument from it. This is followed by the conclusion that today's "frenzy" over the continuation of amy-jill Gnostic's heresy in today's popular fiction that Jesus was sexually active is a result of our having "been conditioned to believe that sex and Christianity Distortion of the Purpose of Scripture Hornsby's true view of Scripture is easily discerned.

She claims that "the Bible's authors were amy-jill much men writing for men on how to control the sexuality of women. Continuing this line of thought, Hornsby consistently credits amy-jill elements of Ancient Near Eastern society as the source of inspiration of Scripture.

She routinely calls sex crimes from adultery to rape "property crimes" instead of moral crimes. As we have already seen, she ignores the obvious language and symbolism the Bible uses to condemn sexual crimes in a moral sense so she is left with nothing but a temporal crime with only cultural norms to guide its governance. She is internally inconsistent with her portrayal levine such crimes, though.

In one breath she claims that adultery is "stealing" the property of another man and that the grater crime of rape of a man's wife is identical: "essentially stealing from your neighbor. This book lists many Bible passages referring to sex, and many that may be referring to sex, but the commentary is extremely brief, and levine to be primarily unsubstantiated personal opinion.

Good as a straight read, as a reference book or study guide for a discussion group. I think most Bible readers would be amazed at the pervasive of sexual tone, references and imagery in scriptures.

One person found this helpful. Good clear explanations. Not an attempt to dramatize the sex in the Bible, but to explain it in the context of the Bible. Many times when Bible scholars present their work, those who believe in direct dictation of the Bible rather than inspiration, attack the methodology and conclusions of scholarship. Unable to accept the Bible as having any other influences than God they find it problematic to admit any cultural and time conditioned aspects to the scriptures.

This is unfortunate. They would have you believe the human authors played no role in the composition and transmission of the text. They imagine God merely using the authors' hand to write the text but no his mind. It is a supernatural work with no real natural origins. All of this weakens the Scriptures for those who think and not merely believe. If you use the facility of reason then this book will serve you.

Thinking and questioning are not sinful. As St. Augustine states " God can not hate in you the one faculty reason that he gave you that separates you fom the animals. A thinking believer is not a contradiction.

For some, it appears impossible. This work will draw you closer to text, the times, and the culture that the biblical writers knew and used to express profound insights and truths. Format: Paperback Verified Purchase.

Most people spend their life reading a Bible that has been twisted throughout time by erroneous translations and interpolations. When you see the horrors committed by scribes during translations and interpolations you begin to understand why this World has gone wrong. The Bible is a book full of violence, war, rape, incest and the whole works, people read it and forget that those are not the original words nor it is a book to be used as a Life Guide or as a Self-Help Book.

It is time to have a true translation of the Bible and that we start seen the Bible as a book full of inconsistencies and not as the purported word of God.

Reading this book gives an unusual understanding of the "Good Book". She adds and detracts as she sees fit. This book is only good for someone studying how liberal, false teachers, warp, twist, add to and remove Scripture to meet their agenda.

I returned the book because it was not what I thought I was ordering. I'm not sure how this got on my order. Format: Paperback. There is a multitude of problems, theological and otherwise, which are readily apparent in the discussion but they all have a common root: a fundamentally different view of Scripture than that of historic, orthodox Christianity. By "low view of Scripture" I mean little or no regard for the inspiration of the text.

This intentional disregard for the Holy Spirit's influence over the biblical authors leads to two categories of faults in Hornsby's work: no qualms with distorting the words of Scripture and a flawed understanding of its purpose. These two products of a low view of Scripture are the foundation of the theological errors in the work. Distortion of the Message of Scripture Hornsby begins distorting the Bible by making false dichotomies which are contrary to the broader theological concerns of the Bible: "Today, many folks for whom the Bible is a central part of their lives also have close gay friends.

How do they balance the commandment to 'love your neighbor' with the commandment to kill gay men? First, the commandment to kill gay men was for the administration of the Jewish government only. It does not apply to Christians in any way except for its implication that homosexuality is offensive to God.

Secondly it creates a false dichotomy between loving our neighbors and the sinfulness of homosexuality. Hornsby views the Bible primarily through the lens of sexuality and sees it as a tool of sexual exploitation. She acts as if homosexuals and other sexual sinners are the only, or at least primary, sinners condemned by the Bible when in fact all are sinners Rom and Christians continue to sin Romans 7. The difference between Christians and non-Christians is not their views or practice of certain sexual habits but turning from the love of evil John to hating that sin within their lives Rom b Rand Paul, a likely contender for the Republican presidential nomination in , has suggested that it should not be a matter of federal concern.

The tide on this issue seems, quite rapidly, to have shifted. Even Christians -- who once stood uniformly against same-sex marriage -- have become more comfortable with the idea, and, one by one, mainstream churches have begun to reconsider it.

One thinks back to those five little words Pope Francis uttered in , spoken casually on a plane flight one evening when reporters asked about his attitude toward gays: "Who am I to judge? These were astonishing words, with this Pope adopting a tone very different from that of his predecessor, who condemned homosexuality as an "intrinsic moral evil. Change has been coming quickly, in fact. Only last June, one saw the powerful Presbyterian Church officially change its position on same-sex marriage.

By a vote of , the elders of the church allowed clergy to marry gay couples in states where that is permissible by law. This vote cleared the way for same-sex marriages in some 10, churches in the United States. Of course, the Episcopal Church to which I belong has been open to gay marriage and clergy, as well for a long time.

In , it elected its first openly gay bishop , Gene Robinson. This bold move created a schism, with a number of parishes leaving the main body of the American church. The worldwide Anglican Communion has indeed been roiled for more than a decade by the gay question, with many African parishes strongly in opposition to homosexuality.

Yet even in Uganda, one of the most anti-gay of African nations, movement has occurred, as when in August that country's Supreme Court struck down a hideous law that sent gays to prison for life simply because of their sexual orientation.

Only a week ago, former President Jimmy Carter -- a lifelong Baptist and Sunday school teacher -- spoke out for gay rights at a college in Michigan. He has, for some time, approved of civil ceremonies for gay people, although he maintains that each church has the right to make its own decision on same-sex marriage. Where he stands personally, however, is not in doubt.

Much of the opposition to homosexuality among Christians over the centuries can be traced to the letters of Paul, the apostle, who also had difficulties with women -- although I do believe that, in context, Paul's attitudes are more complex than many assume. It's important to remember, though, that he was raised an orthodox Jew, a Pharisee by training, and there was a strong prohibition against homosexual acts in many strains of Judaism, as in Leviticus But Judaism is a religion of many voices -- a quick glance at the Talmud will make that obvious.

Nobody gets the last word on any issue of note. So what did Jesus think about homosexuality -- or sexuality itself, for that matter? The Bible makes adultery a capital crime; if that legislation were put into practice, we'd knock out a third of our population.

King Solomon had wives and concubines; we become apoplectic over bigamy. Fifth, we should continually reassess our views. If we ignore tradition, experience, science, and the personal testimony of our neighbors and look only to Scripture, we become bibliolators: we turn the Bible into an idol. And if we listen to those with whom we disagree rather than dismiss them as benighted literalists or atheistic relativists, then at the very least we might be able to avoid the demonization that usually comes with the culture wars.

US Edition U. News U. HuffPost Personal Video Horoscopes. Newsletters Coupons. Terms Privacy Policy. Part of HuffPost Religion. All rights reserved. Tap here to turn on desktop notifications to get the news sent straight to you.